A comparative case study on
buy-side and sell-side digital innovation
BUSM7045 – Digital Business Innovation
Individual Case Study Presentation
That asymmetry is the whole argument
Label years align an ~11-month fiscal offset (Inditex FY ends 31 Jan). 2025 = Inditex FY2025 only; no L’Oréal 2025 figure in the source set.
Dates per primary press releases; Zara €1.8bn logistics and materials-deal dates are trade-press corroborated (Sourcing Journal / FashionUnited).
Both digitised the channel from opposite ends — and converged at ~26–28% of sales.
One shared % axis. 2020 spike is pandemic-distorted (stores shut; Inditex total sales fell). Hollow points: Inditex FY2022–23 % computed from official € figures; FY2024 26.7% per Modaes. Fiscal years differ — Inditex FY ends 31 Jan, L’Oréal reports calendar years (~11-month offset).
Speed — the Zara loop
Personalization — the L’Oréal loop
Proprietary data + fast iteration
From implementer to designer of the model
Technical depth → data leverage → business design
Author–date style; full URLs held in the accompanying source list.
“Features get copied; systems compound — Zara compounds speed, L’Oréal compounds data.”