A comparative case study on
buy-side and sell-side digital innovation
BUSM7045 – Digital Business Innovation
Individual Case Study Presentation
Label years align an ~11-month fiscal offset (Inditex FY ends 31 Jan). 2025 = Inditex FY2025 only; no L’Oréal 2025 figure in the source set.
Avatar from your own photo; 43 markets, 7M+ sessions (FY2025)
Every store becomes a fulfilment hub
100% of stores; 90% of products by SS2026
€1.8bn over 2024–2025; ~€2.3bn capex planned for 2026
€50m textile fund; Ambercycle off-take >€70m
CEO frames AI + diversification as growth levers (2026)
Dates per primary press releases; Zara €1.8bn logistics and materials-deal dates are trade-press corroborated (Sourcing Journal / FashionUnited).
Both digitised the channel from opposite ends — and converged at ~26–28% of sales.
One shared % axis. 2020 spike is pandemic-distorted (stores shut; Inditex total sales fell). Hollow points: Inditex FY2022–23 % computed from official € figures; FY2024 26.7% per Modaes. Fiscal years differ — Inditex FY ends 31 Jan, L’Oréal reports calendar years (~11-month offset).
Ship a minimal AI product. Cycle time < 2 weeks
Capture first-party data. Personalization rate ≥ 60%
Re-engage on behavioural data. 30-day retention ≥ 30%
Close the loop. Halve cycle time again
Cycle time · personalization rate · 30-day retention
Ship real AI features; GenAI fluency
Capture and compound a proprietary data asset
Unit economics, moats, go-to-market
Technical depth → data leverage → business design
Author–date style; full URLs held in the accompanying source list.
“Features get copied; systems compound — Zara compounds speed, L’Oréal compounds data.”