A comparative case study on
buy-side and sell-side digital innovation
BUSM7045 – Digital Business Innovation
Individual Case Study Presentation
Avatar from your own photo; 43 markets, 7M+ sessions (FY2025)
Every store becomes a fulfilment hub
100% of stores; 90% of products by SS2026
€1.8bn over 2024–2025; ~€2.3bn capex planned for 2026
€50m textile fund; Ambercycle off-take >€70m
CEO frames AI + diversification as growth levers (2026)
| Dimension | Zara (buy-side) | L’Oréal (sell-side) |
|---|---|---|
| Value-chain focus | Supply chain, production, logistics | Marketing, discovery, personalization |
| Ten-Types cluster | Configuration (Process, Structure, Network) | Experience (Channel, Engagement, Service) |
| Core moat | Speed / operating model | Proprietary data / personalization |
| Signature old asset | ~2-week design-to-store, RFID, near-shoring | ModiFace AR, SkinConsult AI |
| Signature new asset | Zara Try-On, SINT ship-from-store, €1.8bn logistics | Beauty Genius, CreAItech, IBM formulation model |
| What is hard to copy | The whole timing loop | The accumulated customer data |
| Key metric | Online 26.8% of €39.9bn sales (FY2025) | E-commerce 28.2% of €43.48bn sales (FY2024) |
Ship a minimal AI product. Cycle time < 2 weeks
Capture first-party data. Personalization rate ≥ 60%
Re-engage on behavioural data. 30-day retention ≥ 30%
Close the loop. Halve cycle time again
Cycle time · personalization rate · 30-day retention
Ship real AI features; GenAI fluency
Capture and compound a proprietary data asset
Unit economics, moats, go-to-market
Technical depth → data leverage → business design
Author–date style; full URLs held in the accompanying source list.
“Features get copied; systems compound — Zara compounds speed, L’Oréal compounds data.”